Two transactions took place in the year which met the definition and recognition criteria
of an expense. The transaction did, however, have a distinct difference which is
highlighted below:
(i)
Transaction one resulted in the decrease of the bank account, an asset; and
(ii)
Transaction two resulted in a loan liability being created
As the accountant was confused with the conceptual treatment of the transactions, he
examined another set of financial statements, showing non-compliance with IFRS, which
treated transaction one as an expense but transaction two as the issue equity preference
shares. The accountant has therefore decided to follow this treatment but is concerned it is
not correct. Do you agree with the treatment? (4 marks)
I disagree with the adjustment because the loan commitment has not been paid off.
Comments
Leave a comment