The cashier of a fastfood restaurant claims that the average amount spent by customers for dinner is P 120. 00. A sample
of 50 customers over a month period was randomly selected and it was found out that the average amount spent for dinner
was P 112. 50. Using a 0.05 level of significance, can it be concluded that the average amount spent by customers is more
than P 120. 00? Assume that the population standard deviation is P 6.50. (Use Critical Value Method)
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu\\le120"
"H_1:\\mu>120"
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a z-test for one mean, with known population standard deviation will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.05," and the critical value for a right-tailed test is "z_c = 1.6449."
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is "R = \\{z:z>1.6449\\}."
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "z=-8.159<1.6449=z_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Using the P-value approach:
The p-value is "p=P(z>-8.159)= 1," and since "p= 1>0.05=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu"
is greater than 120, at the "\\alpha = 0.05" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment