Answer to Question #240847 in Philosophy for Esubalew

Question

Read the following arguments carefully and identify the specific fallacy committed by
giving a brief explanation for your answer. And write “no fallacy” if the argument is not
fallacious
1. Eyosias said that “being the most ethical and genius lecturer in the department of philosophy,
the lecturer of introduction to philosophy admires the lecturer of logic and critical thinking.”
Wherefore, the lecturer of logic and critical thinking is the most ethical and genius lecturer.
2. Scholars about globalization believe that the Western hemisphere keeps going dominating
the global system because the hemisphere comprises of military mighty, economically and
politically developed countries. But I believe otherwise, and the reason is because the
hemisphere comprises the white human race.

Answer 1

Globalization isn't only a monetary wonder, yet a political, social, military, and ecological one also. Nor is globalization new; organizations of association traversing mainlands were expanding quickly a long time before the First World War as the steam motor and the message decreased the expense of transportation and data. What separates globalization today is the speed and volume of cross-line contacts. 

The prophets of globalization have trumpeted its advantages, especially how the expanded progression of products, administrations, and capital across boundaries can help monetary action and improve thriving. During the 1990s the more globalized economies grew a normal of 5% per year, while the less globalized economies shrunk by a normal of 1% every year. The spread of thoughts and data across the Internet and other worldwide media has widened social skylines and enabled individuals all throughout the planet to challenge despotic rulers and advance the reason for common freedoms and popular government. Globalization can even decrease the shot at war. Expecting that conflict with Pakistan would disturb their connections to U.S.- based multinationals, India's amazing electronic area effectively squeezed New Delhi in mid-2002 to deescalate its contention with Pakistan. 

Yet, globalization additionally brings awful new risks. A modest bunch of men from most of the way across the globe can commandeer four business carriers and hammer them into key images of American force, killing thousands. A PC programmer in the Philippines can close down the Internet and upset online business huge number of miles away. Theorists can deliver a sudden spike in demand for the Thai cash, diving Russia and Brazil into downturn, denying American exporters of business sectors, and costing American positions. Ozone depleting substances aggregating in the environment in recently roaring economies can raise worldwide temperatures, perhaps flooding waterfront fields and transforming mountain glades into deserts. 

More awful, for the United States, is that its force makes it a magnet for illegal intimidation. As Richard Betts has contended, America's influence "enlivens both the psychological oppressors' motivations and their selection of strategies… . Political and social force makes the United States an objective for the people who fault it for their issues. Simultaneously, American monetary and military force keeps them from opposing or fighting back against the United States according to its own preferences. To destroy the main superpower requires unusual methods of power and strategies [which] offer desire to the feeble that they can work their will regardless of their general shortage in power." Worse still, other frail nations may choose to purchase their security by deliberately ignoring fear monger exercises on their dirt, in this manner expanding the danger to the United States.