2. One of the undersecretaries of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) claims that the average salary of a civil engineer is Php 18,000. A sample of 19 civil engineer's salary has a mean of Php 17,350 and a standard deviation of Php 1,230. Is there enough evidence to reject the undersecretary's claim at a = 0.01?
Solution:
step 1: null and alternative hypothesis
H0:__________
H1:__________
step 2: Significance level a =__________
step 3: test statistic
step 4: decision rule
step 5: decision
1. The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu=18000"
"H_1:\\mu\\not=18000"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown population standard deviation, using the sample standard deviation, will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.01," "df=n-1=18" and the critical value for a two-tailed test is "t_c =2.87844."
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R = \\{t:|t|>2.87844\\}."
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "|t|=2.3035<2.87844=t_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Using the P-value approach:
The p-value for two-tailed, "df=18" degrees of freedom, "t=-2.3035" is "p=0.033391," and since "p=0.033391>0.01=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu"
is different than 18000, at the "\\alpha = 0.01" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment