Answer to Question #301420 in Psychology for sheeza

Question

The issue of nature vs. nurture has long been a source of debate. Within personality psychology, the question becomes, “to what extent is personality the result of biology (e.g., genetics, evolution) and to what extent is it the result of environment and experiences?”

Summarize the nature vs. nurture debate as it relates to personality psychology, including arguments for and against each side. On what side do you fall in the nature–nurture debate

discuss your personal experiences and observations. For example, parents often note that their children seem to be born with certain personality characteristics, as evidenced by differences in their children’s behaviour early on (for example, some parents find that one of their children is an “easy” or good-natured baby, whereas another one of their children may have been a more “difficult” or fussy baby; this could be used as an example of the possible role of nature if both siblings were exposed to similar conditions as infants).

Answer 1

Children are born with certain traits naturally. Such traits include leadership skills, ability to sing or playing football. On the other hand, children can be nurtured to have these skills in their lives. Personally, I am of the idea that children are nurtured to become what they want. Nurturing encompasses usual trainings, something that makes these people to perfect the necessary skills. I have observed this through my personal experiences. Initially, I did not know how to sing, but currently, I am doing it perfectly.